Dr. Gideon B. Smith, UMSOM Class of 1840: 17-Year Cicada Expert

The Health Sciences and Human Services Library Historical Collections’ strives to provide broad access to our diverse collections both in person and digitally. Materials in our collections appear as they originally were published or created and may contain offensive or inappropriate language or images and may be offensive to users. The University of Maryland, Baltimore does not endorse the views expressed in these materials. Materials should be viewed in the context in which they were created.

“Locust Year. – The seventeen year Locusts will appear this year in all those parts of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Delaware, embraced in the following boundaries: commencing at the Delaware river, near Germantown, Pa.; thence southwesterly to the Blue Ridge of the Allegany mountains along the east side of the Ridge to Loudoun and Fauquier counties, Va; thence easterly through a portion of Fairfax, across the Potomac, above Georgetown, through Montgomery and upper portion of Anne Arundel counties, Md., the Patapsco; along the north side of the Patapsco to the Chesapeake Bay; thence to Havre-de-Grace, through to Cecil County, and Delaware, to the Delaware river; up the west side of that river to the beginning…

They will begin to leave the ground about the 20th of May, a few days earlier or later, according to the weather.”

~Dr. Gideon B. Smith, The Sun, February 1, 1851

Many of us, read articles similar to the one quoted above in early 2021 preparing us to see and hear Brood X Cicadas.  Scientists, relying on research begun 187 years ago, predicted with surprising accuracy where and when the 17-year cicadas would appear in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia.

Most of us living near wooded areas have become accustomed to the hum and fluttering of the 17-year cicadas over the past few weeks.  The 2021 cicadas have inspired everything from cuisine to artwork to tattoos.  Whether you love the loud buzz or cannot wait for them to just go away, the cicadas have created a lot of buzz this summer.  Much of what is known about the thirteen- and seventeen-year locusts is credited to the work of University of Maryland, School of Medicine graduate Dr. Gideon B. Smith, class of 1840. 

Gideon B. Smith was born in 1793.  He married Elizabeth Bennett in 1826; this marriage produced a daughter Elizabeth Smith in 1829.  The elder Elizabeth died in 1832; Gideon remarried Susan Stewart in 1833.  Smith’s daughter, Elizabeth married Captain James Gavet.

Patent drawing with four legs and two spindels to produce silk
Smith’s Improved Silk Reel, image from New England Farmer, 01/22/1830. https://newscomwc.newspapers.com/image/404564644.

Smith had an active career in newspapers, entomology, and as an inventor and entrepreneur prior to attending and graduating from medical school.  He was editor of the American Farmer, a newspaper headquartered in Baltimore that shared agricultural news, market prices for livestock and crops, and reports from agricultural societies.  He had a special interest in silkworms, which included importing and selling the caterpillars and their cocoons in the United States; he even invented a silk reel in 1829, which improved upon the Piedmontese Reel.  In 1830, Smith released A Treatise on the Culture of Silk, Detailing the Method of Raising the Mulberry, Managing the Silkworms and Reeling the Silk. In 1838, he became the editor of the Journal of the American Silk Society.

Gideon B. Smith had a friendship with John James Audubon, the American ornithologist.  Smith was a subscriber of Audubon’s Birds of America and for his financial support received the honor of having a bird named after him: the Smith’s Lark-Bunting or Plectrophanes Smithii.  Today the bird is known as Calcarius pictus or Smith’s Longspur.

Colored drawing of a bird sitting on a grassy ledge, bird has black wings and a light brown belly
Smith’s Lark Bunting drawing from Audubon’s, Birds of America. Image from Biodiversity Heritage Library: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/124981#page/9/mode/1up.

Smith also had a friendship and professional relationship with Dr. Nathaniel Potter, founder of the College of Medicine predecessor of the University of Maryland School of Medicine.  Dr. Potter first noticed the cicadas (Brood X) in 1783 and began studying the bugs in 1817. 

Handdrawn cicadas from larvae to full-grown winged-bug
Cicada drawings from Scientific American article, 1851. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24933163.

According to Smith’s article, “The American Locust, ‘Cicada Septemdecim’,” he began studying periodical locusts in 1834 with Potter.  In 1839 Smith assisted Dr. Potter with his book Notes on the Locusta. Perhaps it was Dr. Potter who encouraged Smith to attend the University of Maryland School of Medicine.  Dr. Smith graduated in 1840 at the age of 47, with a thesis titled, Cholera Infantum.  Dr. Smith was admitted to the Maryland State Medical Society (MedChi) in 1843.  Unfortunately, he was dismissed from the organization in 1848 by the Maryland Board of Examiners for unprofessional conduct.  It is unclear what caused this dismissal from the medical profession. 

After the death of Dr. Potter in 1843, Dr. Smith continued his research of periodical cicadas.  Using his connections in the newspaper world, he collected data on cicadas by writing letters to newspapers asking people to send him with observations of cicada emergence in their region.  Through this data collection method, he was able to predict when and where the 17-year cicadas would appear in sixteen U.S. regions.  Through a similar data collection method, Dr. Smith tracked other broods of 13-year and 17-year cicadas from 1845 to 1858.  Unfortunately, Dr. Smith never formally published his research on periodical cicadas in manuscript format, relying instead on newspaper articles; therefore, until recently Dr. Smith’s impact on entomology was lesser known.

Dr. Gideon B. Smith died on March 24, 1867.  He is buried in Baltimore’s Mount Olivet Cemetery

References and Further Reading:

Posted in Historical Collections, Medicine | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dr. Gideon B. Smith, UMSOM Class of 1840: 17-Year Cicada Expert

Big News – We’re Region 1!

The HSHSL will continue as a Regional Medical library from 2021-2026 in the Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM). The HSHSL will also headquarter the Network Web Services Office (NWSO) for the NNLM, serving all seven of the NNLM regions. This prestigious cooperative agreement is overseen by the National Library of Medicine at NIH and will be worth almost $10M over the five years. The NNLM mission is to improve health by providing access to biomedical and health information, through awards and training, to everyone from researchers and public health workers to members of the public. Members include not only libraries and information professionals but also public health departments and community groups with interests in health and health care.

As one of UMB’s longest running awards, for over 35 years, the HSHSL served as the regional headquarters for the Southeastern Atlantic (SEA) Region of the NNLM, encompassing ten states, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and DC. This year, the NNLM realigned and reduced the number of regions.  The new Region 1 includes DC, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia from the former SEA region. Delaware, Kentucky, New Jersey, and  Pennsylvania are the new regional colleagues. The HSHSL looks forward to developing collegial and effective relationships within the region and across the other six regions within the NNLM.

Posted in Announcement, News | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Big News – We’re Region 1!

Citizen Science: Gearing Up for Discovery

Explore citizen science through the lens of community and environmental health with a new HSHSL-created edX course, Citizen Science: Gearing Up for Discovery. This asynchronous, free course builds skills in non-scientists who may want to implement or participate in a citizen science project. It’s uniquely focused on health-related projects in environmental health and public health. Enroll Now: http://bit.ly/HSHSLCitizenScience You can start at any time and work at your own pace!

Posted in Announcement | Tagged , | Comments Off on Citizen Science: Gearing Up for Discovery

HSHSL Closed for the Memorial Day Weekend 5/29 – 5/31

flags with text Memorial Day, Celebrate, Honor, Remember

The HSHSL will be closed Saturday, May 29 – Monday, May 31 in honor of Memorial Day.  

Posted in Announcement | Tagged | Comments Off on HSHSL Closed for the Memorial Day Weekend 5/29 – 5/31

Chemical and Philosophical Apparatus at the University of Maryland

Blog post researched and written by Spring 2021 HSHSL Intern, Elizabeth Brown. Elizabeth is a student of the Masters of Library and Information Science program at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She recently completed an internship at the HSHSL working with the Historical Collections.

The Health Sciences and Human Services Library Historical Collections’ strives to provide broad access to our diverse collections both in person and digitally. Materials in our collections appear as they originally were published or created and may contain offensive or inappropriate language or images and may be offensive to users. The University of Maryland, Baltimore does not endorse the views expressed in these materials. Materials should be viewed in the context in which they were created.

The case of the missing apparatus:

On March 29, 1822 a minor but interesting scandal was recorded. From the University of Maryland Faculty Minutes 1812 – 1839[1] (page 14):

“D Hoffman Esq & Drs Pattison & Howard to attend were appointed a committee with instructions to make an arrangement with the representative of Monsieur Mercier of the firm late of this city ‘Decaves & Mercier’ relative to a debt of Five thousand Dollars due by him to the University of Maryland. This being the amount of a bill of exchange entrusted to him for the purchase of Chemical & Philosophical apparatus in Paris [crossed out] whether he was then going. and [sic] of the amount of which he defrauded the University.”

To wit: the University entrusted $5000 (the equivalent of $113,195 today[2]) to a French company in order to buy scientific, laboratory equipment in Paris but the person who they trusted to make the purchase took the money and ran. The faculty formed a committee to try to recover what they were owed, although the results of their efforts isn’t recorded.

But what were “Chemical & Philosophical apparatus” at that time?

Black and white images of various medical appartus of the 19th century.

Contemporaneous examples of the chemical equipment are illustrated in The Rudiments of Chemistry by Samuel Parkes (1823)[3] along with instructions on the equipment’s use for demonstrating chemical theorems and how they could be applied on matter as it was understood at the time. These include glassware that was frequently created for distilling purposes such as retorts, bladders, and funnels.

Handdrawn image of apparatus used in scientific study.

“Philosophical apparatus” referred to scientific equipment used for conducting experiments in other, often newly-developing, fields of science such as astronomy and electricity. Examples can be seen in Catalogue of the philosophical apparatus, minerals, geological specimens &c by Charles Daubeny (1861)[4] and in A catalogue of philosophical, astronomical, chemical and electrical apparatus by Joseph M Wightman (1846) [5].    

Black and white images of chemical appartus from catalogf Numerous purchases of “apparatus” are recorded in Eugene Cordell’s histories of the University of Maryland[6] including an initial sum of $50,000 ($752,941 in today’s currency[7]) endowed for the purpose of buying “chemical and scientific apparatus and anatomical preparations” (Cordell 31) when the University was established by Acts of the state legislature 1814. This collection grew incrementally over time, with different faculty purchasing equipment to use for demonstration purposes in their lectures and occasionally donating their personal collections to the University. Eventually enough materials were amassed that the collections became distinguished as “Chemical apparatus” budgeted for $8300 ($238,965 modern currency[8]) in 1830 (Cordell 68).

Cordell mentions how an “immense galvanic apparatus” (Cordell 189) created by Chemistry Professor Elisa DeButts[9] was brought out for demonstration when General Lafayette, the French aristocrat and acclaimed military officer in the American Revolutionary War, paid a ceremonial visit to the University in 1824.

An 1838 course catalog for the School of Medicine boasts[10]:

“The Chemical and Philosophical apparatus of this University is of great extent and value, much of it having been selected in Europe by the late distinguished Professor Debutts. And to a Laboratory, provided with every thing necessary for a course of Chemical Instruction, are united the numerous and varied articles required to illustrate the lectures on Pharmacy and Materia Medica. Neither expense nor care has been spared to secure for the University of Maryland, the facilities necessary for the acquisition of thorough Medical Education.”

Black and white drawing of Prof. DeButts' New Galvanic InstrumentsThe school also purchased equipment to remain up to date on new technologies and to provide more advanced levels of classes for its students as the school grew in size, stature, and scope. Joseph Roby, the chair of Anatomy between 1842 and 1860, is cited as the earliest teacher to incorporate the use of microscopes into his lectures. (Cordell 230) Classes which trained students on using microscopes eventually became a required part of the syllabus in 1895. (Cordell 432) The value of experiential learning is described in the 1844-1845 course catalog describing Professor William E A Aikin’s course on Chemistry and Pharmacy: “The apparatus in this department is believed to be unequalled by that of any other Institution, an affords every possible facility for teaching a science which can only be taught by experiment.”[11]

But the equipment wasn’t considered valuable just for its educational uses. Cordell recounts several instances of equipment being stolen, including this instance in 1837:

Photograph of a small microscope“They [University faculty and staff] found some articles missing from the Museum which had been claimed by members of the Regents’ Faculty as private property. They also found in one of the rooms of his house three vessels that had contained liquors, and a coarse bowie-knife made out of part of an old sword, which one of the young men afterwards called for…” (Cordell 81)

While the specialized glassware remained rare, it was kept locked up in the classrooms and laboratories as much as possible to prevent such cases of theft and misuse. With time, the materials that were being purchased would eventually become easier to make and acquire, allowing for less restrained access. The same year microscopy became a required part of the syllabus, Cordell notes: “The Chemical Laboratory previously open chiefly for class instruction, was so arranged as to give students an opportunity for individual work at any hour of the day, under the guidance of Professor Daniel Base…” (Cordell 432)

Eventually the materials become so accessible that they were transformed from “chemical apparatus” to “chemistry sets”- an educational toy sold to children.[12]  [13]  [14]

Photograph of an 19th century chemistry set, complete with chemical viles in compartments and a book with instructions on using itFootnotes:

[1] University of Maryland Faculty Meeting Minutes 1812 – 1839. Available at: https://archive.hshsl.umaryland.edu/handle/10713/6322

[2] CPI Inflation Calculator. Available at: https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/1822?amount=5000

[3] Parkes, Samuel. (1823) The rudiments of chemistry; illustrated by experiments and copper-plate engravings of chemical apparatus. Available at: https://archive.hshsl.umaryland.edu/handle/10713/3080    

[4] Daubeny, Charles. (1861). Catalogue of the philosophical apparatus, minerals, geological specimens, & c. in the possession of Dr. Daubeny, Praelector of natural philosophy in Magdalen college, and now deposited in the building contiguous to the Botanic gardens, belonging to that society. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/28100

[5] Wightman, Joseph M. (1846) A catalogue of philosophical, astronomical, chemical and electrical apparatus. Available at: https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/cataloguephilos00wigh

[6] Cordell, Eugene F. (1907) University of Maryland, 1807-1907, its history, influence, equipment and characteristics, with biographical sketches and portraits of its founders, benefactors, regents, faculty and alumni. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10713/12583  

[7] CPI Inflation Calculator. Available at: https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/1814?amount=50000

[8] CPI Inflation Calculator. Available at: https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/1830?amount=8300

[9]“Mechanics, Physics, Chemistry, and the Arts.” (1824) The American Journal of Science and Arts. Available at: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_American_Journal_of_Science_and_Arts/ZEBSAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=galvanic+apparatus+elisha+debutts&pg=PA271&printsec=frontcover

[10] University of Maryland, School of Medicine Catalog 1838-1880.  Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10713/2619

[11] University of Maryland, School of Medicine Catalog 1838-1880.  Available at: https://archive.org/details/medicine37unse/page/n82/mode/1up?q=Apparatus

[12] Cook, Rosie. (April 6, 2010) “Chemistry at Play.” Science History Institute. Available at: https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/chemistry-at-play

[13] Zielinski, Sarah. (October 10, 2012) “The Rise and Fall and Rise of the Chemistry Set.” Smithsonian Magazine. Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-rise-and-fall-and-rise-of-the-chemistry-set-70359831/

[14] “Playing with Science: A Brief History of the Chemistry Set.” (May 15, 2019). Science Museum. Available at: https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/chemistry/playing-science-brief-history-chemistry-set

Posted in Historical Collections | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Chemical and Philosophical Apparatus at the University of Maryland

Online Resources Down, May 24, Starting at 8PM

Scheduled Maintenance

Due to a scheduled update, online resources such as databases and journals may be unavailable Monday, May 24, 2021 starting at 8pm. The outage is expected to last for approximately 2 hours. 

Contact the Information Services desk for help at 410-706-7995 or hshsl@umaryland.edu.

Posted in Alerts | Comments Off on Online Resources Down, May 24, Starting at 8PM

Check Out the Latest Connective Issues Newsletter!

In this issue:

Posted in Announcement | Tagged | Comments Off on Check Out the Latest Connective Issues Newsletter!

Vaccine lessons from the early 1800s: The Boon of Jenner and Covid-19

Blog post researched and written by Spring 2021 HSHSL Intern, Hanna Takemoto. Hanna is a new graduate of the MLIS program at the University of Maryland, College Park. She recently completed an internship at the HSHSL where she worked on a collection of 19th century School of Medicine dissertations.

The Health Sciences and Human Services Library Historical Collections’ strives to provide broad access to our diverse collections both in person and digitally. Materials in our collections appear as they originally were published or created and may contain offensive or inappropriate language or images and may be offensive to users. The University of Maryland, Baltimore does not endorse the views expressed in these materials. Materials should be viewed in the context in which they were created.

As the world continues to grapple with the relentless coronavirus, vaccines remain the most promising tool in our arsenal. In fact, we are in the midst of what can be described as the most ambitious vaccination effort in human history. The unprecedented speed of the Covid-19 vaccine development has been a source of pride and hope, but also anxiety. According to the latest estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau, 15% of Americans do not plan on getting vaccinated against Covid-19. When we consider the successful vaccination campaigns of the 20th century that eradicated polio, tuberculosis, and measles, vaccine hesitancy may seem like a modern phenomenon fuelled by the online spread of misinformation. However, students at the University of Maryland’s School of Medicine were writing about vaccine hesitancy as early as 1825. In his dissertation titled “Vaccination”, soon-to-be Doctor of Medicine Robert Stuart McKaig argued that:

Although the history of vaccination has been but the history of its uniform and ascendant progress over all obstacles, whether of ignorance, prejudice or avarice, still there have always been those who, unwilling or unable to survey the whole subject, have preferred to rely on their own limited experience of a few doubtful cases and reject the boon of Jenner rather than yield assent to a mass of evidence such as has rarely, if ever, been accumulated in any other department of human investigation.   

Jenner and his two colleagues seeing off three anti-vaccination opponents, the dead are littered at their feet. Coloured etching by Isaac Cruikshank, 1808. Credit: Wellcome Library, London Distributed under a CC-BY 4.0 License

“The boon of Jenner” refers to the 1796 discovery of the smallpox vaccine by the English doctor Edward Jenner. Before its eradication in 1980, smallpox was one of the oldest and most deadly communicable diseases. The earliest evidence of a smallpox death dates back to 1157 B.C. and the fatality rate was between 25 and 30%. Those who survived were often left scarred or even blind.

Inoculation against smallpox had been common in China, the Middle East, and parts of Africa for centuries, and eventually made its way to Great Britain and New England. Variolous material from an infected person would be introduced into the body of a healthy one in order to induce a milder form of the disease and subsequent immunity. The practice reduced mortality rates significantly, but still carried the risk of severe infection. An 1835 graduate, Frederick Butler, wrote in  “Inaugural Dissertation on Vaccination” that:

The lovely and fair still shuddered, lest theirs might be the countenance to bear the impression of deformity: and still willing to hold out their arm to the injecting puncture, rather than risk the danger of the natural disease.

Edward Jenner’s vaccine was safer because it used material from a cow infected with cowpox, a similar but much milder disease (the word vaccine is derived from the Latin word for cow, vacca). Frederick Butler explains:

It had been long observed before this discovery was made known, that certain persons connected with dairys [sic, dairies] in Great Britain were not susceptible of small pox, either natural or by inoculation. And also that these persons were previously affected with a singular kind of pustular soreness caught from milking cows whose udder exhibited the same pustular appearence. These facts were remarked as coincidency, yet no general inference had been drawn from them until Dr. Jenner, investigating the disease of the kine on the spot, came to the conclusion that this disease of the cow might be communicated and would secure the person who had received it from the action of small pox.

The smallpox vaccine was introduced to Baltimore in 1800 by John Crawford, a physician who briefly taught at the University of Maryland and whose book collection became the foundation for HSHSL.

A comparison of smallpox (left) and cowpox (right) inoculations 16 days after administration. Color engraving by George Kirtland, 1802 -1806. Credit: 30 plates of the small pox and cow pox drawn from nature / [by Capt. Gold, R.A.] Published [and engraved] by G.K. Public domain.

Although Dr. Jenner was probably not the first person to try inoculation with the cowpox virus, his contributions were groundbreaking because he carefully formulated his hypothesis and tested it through well-documented experiments and observations. His approach was reminiscent of today’s evidence-based medicine and laid the foundations for the development of other effective vaccines. The following passage from Charles Wesley Parker’s 1828 essay Cow-pox as a Preventive of Small-pox” rings remarkably true in 2021:

The discovery of a remedy in the prevention of so loathsome and fatal disease as that of small pox, may justly be ranked among the first in any age and in any science. In the preservations of human life, and in the alleviation of human suffering, this discovery stands unrivalled, and is justly entitled to be placed at the head of that long list of discoveries of which the medical profession can boast.

Indeed, the impressive efficacy of the smallpox vaccine, developed at a time when epidemiology was still in its infancy, is a testament to the power of immunization. Vaccines have saved millions of lives around the world and continue to protect our communities from dangerous diseases. We owe it to the vaccine pioneers, the future generations, and to ourselves to make good use of this discovery. To find a Covid-19 vaccine near you, go to: www.vaccinefinder.org

Sources and further reading

Posted in Historical Collections | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Vaccine lessons from the early 1800s: The Boon of Jenner and Covid-19

Poster Printing at the HSHSL

picture of a poster printer

The HSHSL offers poster printing to all UMB faculty, students, and staff and University of Maryland Medical Center staff. Posters are printed in support of academic, professional, and research purposes. 

Posters are printed up to a maximum of 42″ x 72″.

You have your choice of material:

  • Our paper option is Glossy Photo Paper and costs $55.
    Great for class assignments and single-use displays.
  • Our fabric option is Matte Lightweight Poly Canvas and costs $55.
    Perfect for traveling exhibits and multiple-use displays.

Poster printing may take up to two business days, please plan accordingly.

All posters must be submitted as a PDF file. Please pay close attention to the information on sizing and formatting your poster.

Posters can be picked up at the Information Services Desk.

For questions, please e-mail poster@hshsl.umaryland.edu or call 410-706-7996.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Poster Printing at the HSHSL

Happy 275th Birthday Dr. John Crawford!

The Health Sciences and Human Services Library Historical Collections’ strives to provide broad access to our diverse collections both in person and digitally. Materials in our collections appear as they originally were published or created and may contain offensive or inappropriate language or images and may be offensive to users. The University of Maryland, Baltimore does not endorse the views expressed in these materials. Materials should be viewed in the context in which they were created.

Photograph of Dr. John Crawford, man with a suit and tie, with a silly birthday hat, confetti, and birthday noisemaker photoshopped on the imageMay 3, 2021 marks 275 years since the birth of Dr. John Crawford, an influential figure for the HSHSL.  His impressive collection of medical texts was purchased by the School of Medicine’s Faculty of Physik for $500 from his daughter Eliza Godefroy after his death in 1813.  The volumes founded the medical library, which was believed to be the first associated with a school of medicine. Today the HSHSL dates its foundation to 1813 and the purchase of this collection.  Dr. Crawford’s volumes remain an important part of the HSHSL’s collections; the 569-volume John Crawford Collection sits in a place of prominence in the Historical Collections’ reading room and represents medical texts from 1565 in English, Latin, French, German, and Dutch.  Most of the texts in the Crawford Collection have been digitized and are available in the UMB Digital Archive.

Dr. John Crawford was born in Ireland on May 3, 1746. He was educated at Trinity College of Dublin and earned his M.D. from the University of Leyden.  He began his medical career as a surgeon sailing with the East India Company.

Dr. Crawford came to the United States in 1796, settling in Baltimore, Md. While in Baltimore, Dr. Crawford introduced the practice of vaccinating for smallpox (1800) and helped to establish the Baltimore Dispensary, which opened in 1801. That same year, Dr. Crawford, a long-standing Mason, was elected Grand Master of the Masonic Order in Maryland, a position he held until his death.

In 1807, Crawford published a series of works on the “Theory and Application to the Treatment of Disease.” In these publications, he outlined his theory, established while working in Dutch Guiana, that diseases were caused by animalculae (insects or worms). This theory was an early example of germ theory and was not well received by the medical community and was ultimately rejected by his colleagues. Undeterred, Dr. Crawford continued to study the theory until his death.

In 1811, he commissioned the treatise A Lecture Introductory to a Course of Lectures on the Cause, Seat and Cure of Diseases. Proposed to be delivered in the City of Baltimore, which became the foundation for a series of lectures given at his home in the fall of 1811. In 1812, Crawford became lecturer on Natural History at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, and served in that capacity until his death on May 9, 1813.

Photograph of a room in the HSHSL Historical Collections, in center of room is a conference table with eight chairs around it, around the room is built in book shelves.

Further Reading:

  • The John Crawford Collection in the Historical Collections.
  • Longer biography of Dr. John Crawford by Richard J. Behles. 
  • Lecture by Dr. Philip Mackowiak on Dr. John Crawford and his library.
  • An Eulogium on the Character of Brother John Crawford, M.D., Late R.W.G.M. of Masons in Maryland : Delivered in the First Presbyterian Church, on the 24th June, 1813, in Obedience to a Resolution of the R.W.G. Lodge of Maryland. By Tobias Watkins, 1813.
Posted in Events, Historical Collections | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Happy 275th Birthday Dr. John Crawford!